1-12001475-C-T

Position:

chr1-12001475-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The ENST00000235329.10(MFN2):c.891C>T(p.Ala297=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00102 in 1,614,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A297A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00084 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MFN2
ENST00000235329.10 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.83

Variant links:

Genes affected

MFN2 (HGNC:16877): (mitofusin 2) This gene encodes a mitochondrial membrane protein that participates in mitochondrial fusion and contributes to the maintenance and operation of the mitochondrial network. This protein is involved in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, and it may play a role in the pathophysiology of obesity. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A2, and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy VI, which are both disorders of the peripheral nervous system. Defects in this gene have also been associated with early-onset stroke. Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

MFN2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).

BP6

Variant 1-12001475-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-12001475-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 292373.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-12001475-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-12001475-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.83 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MFN2	NM_014874.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.891C>T	p.Ala297=	synonymous_variant	9/19	ENST00000235329.10	NP_055689.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MFN2	ENST00000235329.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.891C>T	p.Ala297=	synonymous_variant	9/19	1	NM_014874.4	ENSP00000235329	P1	O95140-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000841

AC:

128

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00893

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00113

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000841

AC:

211

AN:

250948

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000789

AC XY:

107

AN XY:

135658

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00953

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000163

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000463

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000811

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00131

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00104

AC:

1517

AN:

1461770

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000982

AC XY:

714

AN XY:

727170

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000896

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000201

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00754

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000101

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00108

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00152

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000840

AC:

128

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000644

AC XY:

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00893

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00113

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.00136

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000948

EpiCase

AF:

0.000382

EpiControl

AF:

0.000713

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Nov 01, 2023	MFN2: BP4, BP7 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Jan 30, 2019	- -

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jul 30, 2015	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Feb 01, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

- -

MFN2-related disorder

Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Nov 29, 2022

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 11, 2019

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with optic atrophy

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.59

CADD

Benign

3.5

DANN

Benign

0.89

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.8

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over