10-100993176-C-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_021830.5(TWNK):c.1735-14C>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00232 in 1,613,960 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0024 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

TWNK
NM_021830.5 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.272

Variant links:

Genes affected

TWNK (HGNC:1160): (twinkle mtDNA helicase) This gene encodes a hexameric DNA helicase which unwinds short stretches of double-stranded DNA in the 5' to 3' direction and, along with mitochondrial single-stranded DNA binding protein and mtDNA polymerase gamma, is thought to play a key role in mtDNA replication. The protein localizes to the mitochondrial matrix and mitochondrial nucleoids. Mutations in this gene cause infantile onset spinocerebellar ataxia (IOSCA) and progressive external ophthalmoplegia (PEO) and are also associated with several mitochondrial depletion syndromes. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

TWNK links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).

BP6

Variant 10-100993176-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-100993176-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136594.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2}.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TWNK	NM_021830.5 link	c.1735-14C>A		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 4	ENST00000311916.8	NP_068602.2	Q96RR1-1E5KSY5Q9H6V3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TWNK	ENST00000311916.8 link	c.1735-14C>A		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 4	1	NM_021830.5	ENSP00000309595.2		Q96RR1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00126

AC:

192

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000507

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000377

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00220

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00104

AC:

262

AN:

251144

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00119

AC XY:

161

AN XY:

135814

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000173

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000719

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000416

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00187

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00130

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00243

AC:

3547

AN:

1461664

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00239

AC XY:

1738

AN XY:

727158

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000478

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000201

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000800

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000730

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00293

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00252

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00126

AC:

192

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00114

AC XY:

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000505

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000377

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00220

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.000790

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00117

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 05, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Infantile onset spinocerebellar ataxia

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Sensory ataxic neuropathy, dysarthria, and ophthalmoparesis

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal dominant 3

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.73

CADD

Benign

2.6

DANN

Benign

0.68

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over