10-93612977-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006204.4(PDE6C):​c.252G>A​(p.Leu84Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.176 in 1,613,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26,106 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L84L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.19 ( 2801 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.18 ( 23305 hom. )

Consequence

PDE6C
NM_006204.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.499

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PDE6C (HGNC:8787): (phosphodiesterase 6C) This gene encodes the alpha-prime subunit of cone phosphodiesterase, which is composed of a homodimer of two alpha-prime subunits and 3 smaller proteins of 11, 13, and 15 kDa. Mutations in this gene are associated with cone dystrophy type 4 (COD4). [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]
PDE6C Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cone dystrophy 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • inherited retinal dystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • cone dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • achromatopsia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 10-93612977-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-93612977-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 95346.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.499 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.23 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PDE6CNM_006204.4 linkc.252G>A p.Leu84Leu synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 22 ENST00000371447.4 NP_006195.3 P51160

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PDE6CENST00000371447.4 linkc.252G>A p.Leu84Leu synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 22 1 NM_006204.4 ENSP00000360502.3 P51160

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.186
AC:
28325
AN:
152020
Hom.:
2792
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.233
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.235
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.154
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.263
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.108
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.104
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.256
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.184
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.180
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.162
AC:
40604
AN:
250660
AF XY:
0.164
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.236
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.107
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.250
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.111
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.113
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.185
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.172
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.175
AC:
256456
AN:
1461624
Hom.:
23305
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.176
AC XY:
127681
AN XY:
727098
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.239
AC:
7990
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.115
AC:
5147
AN:
44710
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.251
AC:
6548
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0990
AC:
3932
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.134
AC:
11540
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.114
AC:
6081
AN:
53344
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.241
AC:
1384
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.182
AC:
202790
AN:
1111880
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.183
AC:
11044
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13268
26536
39805
53073
66341
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
7108
14216
21324
28432
35540
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.186
AC:
28367
AN:
152138
Hom.:
2801
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.182
AC XY:
13540
AN XY:
74390
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.233
AC:
9681
AN:
41480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.153
AC:
2346
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.263
AC:
912
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.107
AC:
554
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.124
AC:
597
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.104
AC:
1109
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.252
AC:
74
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.184
AC:
12490
AN:
67982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.185
AC:
390
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1150
2300
3451
4601
5751
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
302
604
906
1208
1510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.130
Hom.:
314
Bravo
AF:
0.194
Asia WGS
AF:
0.140
AC:
486
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Sep 19, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Dec 18, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Achromatopsia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cone dystrophy 4 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
6.8
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
0.50
PromoterAI
0.0092
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1131978; hg19: chr10-95372734; COSMIC: COSV65117966; API