11-17574824-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):c.2398G>C(p.Asp800His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000258 in 1,550,214 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D800N) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001292063.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18BInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001292063.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000134 AC: 2AN: 148710 AF XY: 0.0000125 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000143 AC: 2AN: 1397976Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000145 AC XY: 1AN XY: 689466 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74360 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at