12-26706463-G-T
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_002223.4(ITPR2):c.951+4710C>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0823 in 152,010 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 677 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.082 ( 677 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
ITPR2
NM_002223.4 intron
NM_002223.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.513
Publications
8 publications found
Genes affected
ITPR2 (HGNC:6181): (inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor family, whose members are second messenger intracellular calcium release channels. These proteins mediate a rise in cytoplasmic calcium in response to receptor activated production of inositol triphosphate. Inositol triphosphate receptor-mediated signaling is involved in many processes including cell migration, cell division, smooth muscle contraction, and neuronal signaling. This protein is a type 2 receptor that consists of a cytoplasmic amino-terminus that binds inositol triphosphate, six membrane-spanning helices that contribute to the ion pore, and a short cytoplasmic carboxy-terminus. A mutation in this gene has been associated with anhidrosis, suggesting that intracellular calcium release mediated by this protein is required for eccrine sweat production. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]
ITPR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- isolated anhidrosis with normal sweat glandsInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-1.0).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.128 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0824 AC: 12509AN: 151892Hom.: 676 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
12509
AN:
151892
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0823 AC: 12511AN: 152010Hom.: 677 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0769 AC XY: 5715AN XY: 74298 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
12511
AN:
152010
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
5715
AN XY:
74298
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
1032
AN:
41442
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1273
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
270
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
175
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
167
AN:
4802
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
528
AN:
10560
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
8836
AN:
67978
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
185
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
559
1118
1678
2237
2796
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
142
284
426
568
710
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
128
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.