12-8863841-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_144670.6(A2ML1):c.3550A>T(p.Ser1184Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00076 in 1,614,240 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_144670.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_144670.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2ML1 | NM_144670.6 | MANE Select | c.3550A>T | p.Ser1184Cys | missense | Exon 29 of 36 | NP_653271.3 | ||
| A2ML1 | NM_001282424.3 | c.2077A>T | p.Ser693Cys | missense | Exon 18 of 25 | NP_001269353.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2ML1 | ENST00000299698.12 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3550A>T | p.Ser1184Cys | missense | Exon 29 of 36 | ENSP00000299698.7 | ||
| A2ML1 | ENST00000541459.5 | TSL:2 | c.2200A>T | p.Ser734Cys | missense | Exon 18 of 25 | ENSP00000443174.1 | ||
| A2ML1 | ENST00000539547.5 | TSL:2 | c.2077A>T | p.Ser693Cys | missense | Exon 18 of 25 | ENSP00000438292.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00384 AC: 585AN: 152246Hom.: 4 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00103 AC: 256AN: 249514 AF XY: 0.000761 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000439 AC: 642AN: 1461876Hom.: 5 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000371 AC XY: 270AN XY: 727240 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00384 AC: 585AN: 152364Hom.: 4 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00370 AC XY: 276AN XY: 74508 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Variant summary: A2ML1 c.3550A>T (p.Ser1184Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Alpha-macroglobulin-like, TED domain (IPR011626) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 280918 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.014 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3500 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in A2ML1 causing Noonan Syndrome and Related Conditions phenotype (4e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3550A>T in individuals affected with Noonan Syndrome and Related Conditions and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two ClinVar submissions (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.
not provided Benign:2
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at