13-32339989-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.5634C>G​(p.Asn1878Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000049 in 1,611,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely benign in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N1878H) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000051 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:5B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.253

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.096607864).
BP6
Variant 13-32339989-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32339989-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 37983.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.5634C>G p.Asn1878Lys missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.5634C>G p.Asn1878Lys missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.5265C>G p.Asn1755Lys missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.5634C>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152024
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000161
AC:
4
AN:
248658
AF XY:
0.00000744
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000355
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000514
AC:
75
AN:
1459624
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
47
AF XY:
0.0000468
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
725936
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000898
AC:
3
AN:
33390
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000226
AC:
1
AN:
44336
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26056
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39666
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
85512
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53278
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5750
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000549
AC:
61
AN:
1111314
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000149
AC:
9
AN:
60322
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.445
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
10
14
19
24
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152024
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74256
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41408
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15242
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5200
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10586
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
67980
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2088
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.513
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:11
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:3
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2012
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 20, 2004
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Jun 18, 2019
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000455 -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Sep 08, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Nov 24, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 24, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified Benign:2
May 09, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.5634C>G (p.Asn1878Lys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 248658 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.5634C>G has has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome and related tumor phenotypes (e.g. Borg 2010, Balia 2011, Lu 2012, Wong-Brown 2015, Dudley_2018, Caputo_2021, Bhai_2021). These reports however do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Two functional studies from the same group utilizing homologous recombination assays to evaluate an impact on protein function, provided conflicting results about the variant (Spugnesi_2013, Balia_2011). However, a recent multifactorial likelihood analysis predicted this variant to be Benign (Parsons_2019). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 21671020, 34326862, 20104584, 21520273, 34597585, 29360161, 24323938, 22476429, 26317927, 25225064, 31131967, 18824701, 23328489, 25782689, 25682074). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 37983). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Feb 10, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Apr 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2: BP1, BP4, BS2 -

Dec 08, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Jul 19, 2013
Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Asn1878Lys variant was identified in 3 of 4892 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals with case of breast cancer (Balia 2011, Capanu 2011). The variant was reported in dbSNP(ID: rs80358784) “With unknown allele”; however, the only frequency information available was from the “ClinSeq project” where the variant was found in one out of 662 participants (allele frequency: 0.001). The variant was identified eight times in UMD as an unclassified variant, and was also reported in the LOVD and HGMD databases. The p.Asn1878 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact of the variant amino acid (Lys) to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. Loss of heterozygosity analysis of tumours from patients with the variant noted an absence of loss of heterozygosity in one study (Balia 2011); however, in another study the variant allele was lost, providing evidence for neutrality (Spearman 2008). Two assays evaluating homologous recombination activity of the variant yielded conflicting results. In a yeast-based assay, Spugnesi (2013) suggests that the variant may not be deleterious as it conferred a phenotype similar to wildtype. However, in a HeLa cell-based assay, the variant had a level of spontaneous homologous recombination similar to a known deleterious mutation, suggesting that the variant may be pathogenic (Balia 2011). Segregation and/or additional functional studies are recommended to further elucidate the pathogenicity of this variant. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Aug 31, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Jan 19, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.17
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
1.2
DANN
Benign
0.84
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.066
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.039
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.097
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.99
T
PhyloP100
-0.25
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.96
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.034
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;T
Vest4
0.26
MutPred
0.31
Loss of ubiquitination at K1875 (P = 0.0237);Loss of ubiquitination at K1875 (P = 0.0237);
MVP
0.69
MPC
0.029
ClinPred
0.042
T
GERP RS
-6.0
gMVP
0.15
Mutation Taster
=88/12
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358784; hg19: chr13-32914126; API