14-102004635-C-T

Position:

chr14-102004635-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.5001C>T(p.Asn1667=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00267 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.53

Variant links:

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

DYNC1H1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).

BP6

Variant 14-102004635-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102004635-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 195810.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.53 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00189 (287/152254) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0052 (27/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00367. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 135 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 287 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.5001C>T	p.Asn1667=	synonymous_variant	24/78	ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.5001C>T	p.Asn1667=	synonymous_variant	24/78	1	NM_001376.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00189

AC:

287

AN:

152136

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000555

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00452

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00519

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000943

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00237

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00202

AC:

509

AN:

251448

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00184

AC XY:

250

AN XY:

135904

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000800

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00330

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00430

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000554

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00241

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00261

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00276

AC:

4028

AN:

1461868

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00255

AC XY:

1856

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000627

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00282

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00426

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00314

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00306

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00189

AC:

287

AN:

152254

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00181

AC XY:

135

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000554

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00451

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00520

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000943

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00237

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.00172

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00217

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00262

EpiControl

AF:

0.00255

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Sep 05, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	May 01, 2024	DYNC1H1: BP4, BP7 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 03, 2015	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Jul 03, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Apr 21, 2015	- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 29, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jun 28, 2016

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

DYNC1H1-related disorder

Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Feb 21, 2024

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

CADD

Benign

1.6

DANN

Benign

0.76

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over