14-65101552-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001407114.1(MAX):āc.80A>Gā(p.Asn27Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000411 in 1,458,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/6 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N27Y) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001407114.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000802 AC: 2AN: 249328Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000148 AC XY: 2AN XY: 134924
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1458582Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 725760
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this variant does not alter splicing; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at