16-2072884-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.2256C>T(p.Gly752Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000496 in 1,613,434 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 250936Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135798
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 726882
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74366
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
- -
- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at