16-2079369-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.3225C>T(p.Thr1075Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000769 in 1,612,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000400 AC: 10AN: 250144Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000737 AC XY: 10AN XY: 135720
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000808 AC: 118AN: 1460636Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000826 AC XY: 60AN XY: 726600
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74294
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:2
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18854862, 26071483) -
TSC2: BP4, BP7 -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1Other:1
- -
- -
TSC2-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at