16-23629919-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_024675.4(PALB2):c.2235A>G(p.Lys745Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000186 in 1,614,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024675.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000795 AC: 2AN: 251494Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135922
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461894Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74360
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at