16-67636838-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_006565.4(CTCF):ā€‹c.1986C>Gā€‹(p.Pro662=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00127 in 1,591,818 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00067 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0013 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

CTCF
NM_006565.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.88
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTCF (HGNC:13723): (CCCTC-binding factor) This gene is a member of the BORIS + CTCF gene family and encodes a transcriptional regulator protein with 11 highly conserved zinc finger (ZF) domains. This nuclear protein is able to use different combinations of the ZF domains to bind different DNA target sequences and proteins. Depending upon the context of the site, the protein can bind a histone acetyltransferase (HAT)-containing complex and function as a transcriptional activator or bind a histone deacetylase (HDAC)-containing complex and function as a transcriptional repressor. If the protein is bound to a transcriptional insulator element, it can block communication between enhancers and upstream promoters, thereby regulating imprinted expression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with invasive breast cancers, prostate cancers, and Wilms' tumors. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 16-67636838-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-67636838-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 210801.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=3}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.88 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00067 (102/152160) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00126 (86/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 36 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 102 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CTCFNM_006565.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1986C>G p.Pro662= synonymous_variant 11/12 ENST00000264010.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CTCFENST00000264010.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1986C>G p.Pro662= synonymous_variant 11/121 NM_006565.4 P4P49711-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000671
AC:
102
AN:
152042
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000328
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000378
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00104
AC:
245
AN:
236456
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000945
AC XY:
121
AN XY:
128104
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000259
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000821
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000699
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000710
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00133
AC:
1918
AN:
1439658
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00127
AC XY:
910
AN XY:
715274
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000122
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000955
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00128
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000670
AC:
102
AN:
152160
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000484
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
74380
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000328
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000378
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.000934
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000793
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 17, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 31, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2022CTCF: BS1, BS2 -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoSep 12, 2014- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 08, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
CTCF-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 22, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.67
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148681672; hg19: chr16-67670741; API