16-89810749-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_000135.4(FANCA):c.480G>A(p.Met160Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000426 in 1,613,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M160T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000135.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Fanconi anemia complementation group AInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, G2P
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANCA | NM_000135.4 | c.480G>A | p.Met160Ile | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 43 | ENST00000389301.8 | NP_000126.2 | |
| FANCA | NM_001286167.3 | c.480G>A | p.Met160Ile | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 43 | NP_001273096.1 | ||
| FANCA | NM_001018112.3 | c.480G>A | p.Met160Ile | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 11 | NP_001018122.1 | ||
| FANCA | NM_001351830.2 | c.426+180G>A | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 9 | NP_001338759.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANCA | ENST00000389301.8 | c.480G>A | p.Met160Ile | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 43 | 1 | NM_000135.4 | ENSP00000373952.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000289 AC: 44AN: 152214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000187 AC: 47AN: 251488 AF XY: 0.000184 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000441 AC: 644AN: 1460940Hom.: 1 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000418 AC XY: 304AN XY: 726846 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000289 AC: 44AN: 152214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000296 AC XY: 22AN XY: 74362 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
- -
The FANCA c.480G>A (p.Met160Ile) variant has not been reported in individuals affected with a FANCA related disease in the published literature. However, this variant has been reported as a somatic variant in an individual with metastatic breast cancer (PMID: 33314633 (2021)) and identified in a reportedly healthy individual (PMID: 24728327 (2014)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00065 (33/50818 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Fanconi anemia Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1Other:1
- -
- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group A Uncertain:1
The FANCA c.480G>A (p.Met160Ile) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.04% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Fanconi anemia. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at