17-63601181-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_016360.4(TACO1):c.98G>T(p.Arg33Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000197 in 151,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016360.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACO1 | NM_016360.4 | c.98G>T | p.Arg33Leu | missense_variant | 1/5 | ENST00000258975.7 | NP_057444.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACO1 | ENST00000258975.7 | c.98G>T | p.Arg33Leu | missense_variant | 1/5 | 1 | NM_016360.4 | ENSP00000258975.6 | ||
ENSG00000288894 | ENST00000690765.1 | n.*107-3353G>T | intron_variant | ENSP00000510085.1 | ||||||
TACO1 | ENST00000684587.1 | c.98G>T | p.Arg33Leu | missense_variant | 1/5 | ENSP00000507435.1 | ||||
TACO1 | ENST00000581120.1 | n.300G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/4 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 151984Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 151984Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74252
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Mitochondrial complex 4 deficiency, nuclear type 8 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jan 16, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at