19-38500654-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PS4_ModeratePM1_SupportingPS3_ModeratePM5PP3_Moderate

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions.This sequence variant predicts a substitution of arginine with cysteine at codon 2458 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Arg2458Cys). The maximum allele frequency for this variant among the six major gnomAD populations is NFE: 0.000008, a frequency consistent with pathogenicity for MHS. This variant has been reported in six unrelated individuals with a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction, all of these individuals had a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (if the proband was unavailable for testing, a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation-positive relative was counted), PS4_Moderate (PMID:24433488, 9450902, 10051009, 15731587). Functional study in HEK293 cells showed an increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists, PS3_Moderate (PMID:9334205, 27586648). This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, use PM1_Supporting to avoid overweighting with PM5 (PMID:21118704). Another variant has been assessed as pathogenic occurs at this codon, p.(Arg2458His) PM5. A REVEL score >0.85 (0.922) supports a pathogenic status for this variant, PP3_Moderate. Based on using Bayes to combine criteria this variant is assessed as Likely Pathogenic, (PMID:29300386). Criteria implemented: PS3_Moderate, PS4_Moderate, PM1_Supporting, PM5, PP3_Moderate. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA024784/MONDO:0007783/012

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RYR1
NM_000540.3 missense

Scores

12
5
1

Clinical Significance

Likely pathogenic; drug response reviewed by expert panel P:9O:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.06

Publications

20 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR1 (HGNC:10483): (ryanodine receptor 1) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in skeletal muscle. The encoded protein functions as a calcium release channel in the sarcoplasmic reticulum but also serves to connect the sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubule. Mutations in this gene are associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility, central core disease, and minicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia. Alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
RYR1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • RYR1-related myopathy
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • central core myopathy
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • King-Denborough syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • malignant hyperthermia of anesthesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • benign Samaritan congenital myopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • congenital myopathy with myasthenic-like onset
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • lethal multiple pterygium syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points.

PS3
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
PS4
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
PM1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
PM5
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
PP3
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RYR1NM_000540.3 linkc.7372C>T p.Arg2458Cys missense_variant Exon 46 of 106 ENST00000359596.8 NP_000531.2 P21817-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RYR1ENST00000359596.8 linkc.7372C>T p.Arg2458Cys missense_variant Exon 46 of 106 5 NM_000540.3 ENSP00000352608.2 P21817-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152158
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00000398
AC:
1
AN:
251256
AF XY:
0.00000736
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000342
AC:
5
AN:
1461702
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000138
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
727150
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53344
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5684
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000450
AC:
5
AN:
1112010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152158
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74346
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41426
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
314
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.525
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
0.0000304
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Likely pathogenic; drug response
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:9Other:9
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Pathogenic:3Other:1
Mar 27, 2019
HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Apr 07, 2023
ClinGen Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions. This sequence variant predicts a substitution of arginine with cysteine at codon 2458 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Arg2458Cys). The maximum allele frequency for this variant among the six major gnomAD populations is NFE: 0.000008, a frequency consistent with pathogenicity for MHS. This variant has been reported in six unrelated individuals with a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction, all of these individuals had a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (if the proband was unavailable for testing, a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation-positive relative was counted), PS4_Moderate (PMID: 24433488, 9450902, 10051009, 15731587). Functional study in HEK293 cells showed an increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists, PS3_Moderate (PMID: 9334205, 27586648). This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, use PM1_Supporting to avoid overweighting with PM5 (PMID: 21118704). Another variant has been assessed as pathogenic occurs at this codon, p.(Arg2458His) PM5. A REVEL score >0.85 (0.922) supports a pathogenic status for this variant, PP3_Moderate. Based on using Bayes to combine criteria this variant is assessed as Likely Pathogenic, (PMID: 29300386). Criteria implemented: PS3_Moderate, PS4_Moderate, PM1_Supporting, PM5, PP3_Moderate. -

Jan 01, 1998
OMIM
Significance:risk factor
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

May 21, 2024
Institute of Human Genetics, Clinical Exome/Genome Diagnostics Group, University Hospital Bonn
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Pathogenic:2Other:1
-
RYR1 database
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Aug 19, 2015
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2023
GeneDx
Significance:Pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect, indicating that R2458C destabilizes the channel, resulting in increased excitability in response to caffeine or halothane and altered channel dynamics (Tong et al., 1997; Bannister et al., 2007; Murayama et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Identified with a second variant in a patient with RYR1-recessive myopathy classified as Dusty core disease in published literature (Garibaldi et al., 2019); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15677376, 9873004, 11668625, 22415532, 18564801, 16958617, 16732084, 16163667, 12208234, 21575570, 15611117, 27586648, 9334205, 20681998, 10051009, 31447099, 35428369, 24433488, 16835904, 12700608, 9450902, 30611313) -

Malignant hyperthermia of anesthesia Pathogenic:2
Jan 05, 2017
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Arg2458Cys variant in RYR1 has been reported in 9 individuals with maligna nt hyperthermia, segregated with disease in 7 affected relatives from 2 families (Manning 1998, Girard 2001, Galli 2006, Klingler 2014) and was absent from larg e population studies. Computational prediction tools suggest that it affects pro tein function. In vitro functional studies provide conflicting evidence about th e impact of p.Arg2458Cys variant on protein function (Tong 1997, Tong 1999, Gira rd 2001, Bannister 2007). However, these types of assays may not accurately repr esent biological function. In summary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, the p.Arg2458Cys variant is likely pathogenic. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PP1_Strong, PM2, PS4_Moderate, PP3. -

May 02, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: RYR1 c.7372C>T (p.Arg2458Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251256 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.7372C>T has been reported in the literature in multiple individuals affected with Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility (example: Manning_1998 and Girard_2001). Functional studies in HEK293 cells have shown this variant increases sensitivity to RYR1 agonists (examples: Murayama_2016 and Tong_1997). These data indicate that the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 9450902, 11668625, 9334205, 27586648). Seven submitters (including an expert panel- ClinGen) have evaluated this variant after 2014 and classified the variant as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. -

RYR1-related disorder Pathogenic:1
Aug 01, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 2458 of the RYR1 protein (p.Arg2458Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs28933397, gnomAD 0.004%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal dominant malignant hyperthemia (PMID: 9450902, 11668625). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 12971). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on RYR1 protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects RYR1 function (PMID: 9334205, 9873004, 27586648). This variant disrupts the p.Arg2458 amino acid residue in RYR1. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 9450902, 12700608, 16732084, 18564801, 22415532). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -

Congenital myopathy with fiber type disproportion;C1840365:King Denborough syndrome;C1850674:Congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia;C2930980:Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1;C5830701:Central core myopathy Pathogenic:1
Sep 07, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

methoxyflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
Mar 24, 2021
PharmGKB
Significance:drug response
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity

sevoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
Mar 24, 2021
PharmGKB
Significance:drug response
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity

isoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
Mar 24, 2021
PharmGKB
Significance:drug response
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity

enflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
Mar 24, 2021
PharmGKB
Significance:drug response
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity

halothane response - Toxicity Other:1
Mar 24, 2021
PharmGKB
Significance:drug response
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity

desflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
Mar 24, 2021
PharmGKB
Significance:drug response
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity

succinylcholine response - Toxicity Other:1
Mar 24, 2021
PharmGKB
Significance:drug response
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.57
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.51
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.49
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.87
.;D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.53
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.44
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.80
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
1.0
D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.74
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.98
D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
1.1
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.6
M;M
PhyloP100
1.1
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.86
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-7.2
D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.92
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D
Vest4
0.87
MutPred
0.90
Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0477);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0477);
MVP
1.0
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
1.0
D
GERP RS
4.0
Varity_R
0.81
gMVP
0.90
Mutation Taster
=1/99
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28933397; hg19: chr19-38991294; API