2-110163014-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001128178.3(NPHP1):c.859+34A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001128178.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Joubert syndrome with renal defectInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P
- nephronophthisis 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Bardet-Biedl syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Senior-Loken syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001128178.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPHP1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.859+34A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000389879.3 | O15259-2 | |||
| NPHP1 | TSL:1 | c.1027+34A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000313169.4 | O15259-4 | |||
| NPHP1 | TSL:1 | c.1024+34A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000376953.3 | O15259-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 248962 AF XY: 0.00
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1309140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 19 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 659394
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at