2-151552782-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.19732-6C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0213 in 1,603,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 430 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164508.2 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | NM_001164507.2 | c.19732-6C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000427231.7 | NP_001157979.2 | |||
NEB | NM_001164508.2 | c.19732-6C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000397345.8 | NP_001157980.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.19732-6C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||||
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.19732-6C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0243 AC: 3696AN: 152072Hom.: 60 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0193 AC: 4643AN: 240150Hom.: 66 AF XY: 0.0185 AC XY: 2404AN XY: 129856
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0210 AC: 30446AN: 1451018Hom.: 370 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0203 AC XY: 14648AN XY: 721736
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0244 AC: 3707AN: 152190Hom.: 60 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0247 AC XY: 1839AN XY: 74392
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 07, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 29, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 01, 2022 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Nemaline myopathy 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at