2-201185954-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_032977.4(CASP10):​c.177A>G​(p.Ser59Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.496 in 1,613,588 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 203,378 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.48 ( 18041 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.50 ( 185337 hom. )

Consequence

CASP10
NM_032977.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.715

Publications

40 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CASP10 (HGNC:1500): (caspase 10) This gene encodes a protein which is a member of the cysteine-aspartic acid protease (caspase) family. Sequential activation of caspases plays a central role in the execution-phase of cell apoptosis. Caspases exist as inactive proenzymes which undergo proteolytic processing at conserved aspartic residues to produce two subunits, large and small, that dimerize to form the active enzyme. This protein cleaves and activates caspases 3 and 7, and the protein itself is processed by caspase 8. Mutations in this gene are associated with type IIA autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and gastric cancer. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2011]
CASP10 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome type 2A
    Inheritance: Unknown, AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.93).
BP6
Variant 2-201185954-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-201185954-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 333418.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.715 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.517 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_032977.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CASP10
NM_032977.4
MANE Select
c.177A>Gp.Ser59Ser
synonymous
Exon 2 of 10NP_116759.2
CASP10
NM_032974.5
c.177A>Gp.Ser59Ser
synonymous
Exon 2 of 10NP_116756.2
CASP10
NM_001230.5
c.177A>Gp.Ser59Ser
synonymous
Exon 2 of 8NP_001221.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CASP10
ENST00000286186.11
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.177A>Gp.Ser59Ser
synonymous
Exon 2 of 10ENSP00000286186.6
CASP10
ENST00000448480.1
TSL:1
c.177A>Gp.Ser59Ser
synonymous
Exon 2 of 8ENSP00000396835.1
CASP10
ENST00000313728.12
TSL:1
c.177A>Gp.Ser59Ser
synonymous
Exon 2 of 8ENSP00000314599.7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.483
AC:
73309
AN:
151912
Hom.:
18023
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.484
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.420
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.418
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.526
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.222
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.333
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.511
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.383
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.522
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.465
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.448
AC:
112498
AN:
250972
AF XY:
0.448
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.483
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.349
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.515
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.226
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.500
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.519
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.466
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.498
AC:
727762
AN:
1461558
Hom.:
185337
Cov.:
48
AF XY:
0.494
AC XY:
359307
AN XY:
727076
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.486
AC:
16265
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.360
AC:
16091
AN:
44706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.522
AC:
13649
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.197
AC:
7821
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.355
AC:
30575
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.499
AC:
26658
AN:
53396
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.410
AC:
2346
AN:
5728
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.526
AC:
585201
AN:
1111786
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.483
AC:
29156
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20890
41780
62671
83561
104451
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
16546
33092
49638
66184
82730
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.483
AC:
73370
AN:
152030
Hom.:
18041
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.476
AC XY:
35338
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.484
AC:
20057
AN:
41452
American (AMR)
AF:
0.417
AC:
6379
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.526
AC:
1822
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.222
AC:
1150
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.334
AC:
1605
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.511
AC:
5397
AN:
10558
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.388
AC:
114
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.522
AC:
35471
AN:
67968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.472
AC:
994
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1940
3881
5821
7762
9702
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
656
1312
1968
2624
3280
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.504
Hom.:
60411
Bravo
AF:
0.474
Asia WGS
AF:
0.301
AC:
1048
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.506
EpiControl
AF:
0.516

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 12, 2023
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 68% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 65. Only high quality variants are reported.

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome type 2A Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2Other:1
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.93
CADD
Benign
0.78
DANN
Benign
0.50
PhyloP100
-0.71
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3900115; hg19: chr2-202050677; COSMIC: COSV53776970; COSMIC: COSV53776970; API