2-214728894-T-C

Position:

chr2-214728894-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.2116A>G(p.Lys706Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000148 in 1,614,084 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.46

Variant links:

Genes affected

BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

BARD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.18410087).

BP6

Variant 2-214728894-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214728894-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127730.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=9, Likely_benign=3}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 13 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BARD1	NM_000465.4 link	c.2116A>G	p.Lys706Glu	missense_variant	11/11	ENST00000260947.9	NP_000456.2	Q99728-1A0AVN2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BARD1	ENST00000260947.9 link	c.2116A>G	p.Lys706Glu	missense_variant	11/11	1	NM_000465.4	ENSP00000260947.4		Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000854

AC:

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000995

AC:

AN:

251320

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000103

AC XY:

AN XY:

135812

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000220

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000155

AC:

226

AN:

1461874

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000143

AC XY:

104

AN XY:

727236

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000199

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000854

AC:

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000538

AC XY:

AN XY:

74358

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000211

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000102

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000233

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000659

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:4Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics	May 23, 2017	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 706 of the BARD1 protein (p.Lys706Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs149262370, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with BARD1-related conditions (PMID: 26315354, 27443514, 29596542, 32268276, 33118316). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127730). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant¬†is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital	Oct 18, 2023	The BARD1 c.2116A>G (p.Lys706Glu) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.020% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in a large case-control study of breast cancer in 9 of 60466 cases and 6 of 53461 controls (PMID: 33471991), and in a small case-control study of epithelial ovarian cancer in 2 of 3236 cases and 1 of 3431 controls (PMID: 26315354). It has been reported in other individuals with breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancer (25186627, 27443514, 29945567, 32885271). This variant is present in two individuals in a database of women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (FLOSSIES database, https://whi.color.com/). In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Baylor Genetics	Mar 24, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Myriad Genetics, Inc.	Jul 29, 2024	This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	May 16, 2016	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Dec 16, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Sep 21, 2018	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 21, 2021	In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26315354, 27443514, 25230021, 29596542, 25186627, 33875564) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Oct 28, 2024	The BARD1 c.2116A>G (p.Lys706Glu) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627 (2015)), endometrial cancer (PMID: 27443514 (2016)), ovarian cancer (PMID: 26315354 (2015)), colorectal cancer (PMID: 33118316 (2020)), and in an individual with multiple primary cancers (PMID: 34326862 (2021)). This variant was observed in numerous breast cancer cases as well as in reportedly healthy individuals in a case-control study (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0002 (26/129080 chromosomes in European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Nov 18, 2024

Variant summary: BARD1 c.2116A>G (p.Lys706Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the second BRCT domain (IPR001357) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0001 in 258182 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00022 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BARD1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (0.0001 vs 0.00025), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.2116A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with endometrial-, breast- or ovarian cancer (Ring 2016, Tung 2014, Ramus 2015, Bhai_2021), however without strong evidence for causality, and it was also found in controls (Ramus 2015). Furthermore, the variant was reported in 2/7325 European American women, who are older than age 70 years, and who have never had cancer (in the FLOSSIES database). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (BRIP1 c.2392C>T (p.Arg798X) in our internal database), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 34326862, 26315354, 27443514, 25186627). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127730). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Familial adenomatous polyposis 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Mar 08, 2023

The BARD1 c.2116A>G (p.Lys706Glu) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.020% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in a large case-control study of breast cancer in 9 of 60466 cases and 6 of 53461 controls (PMID: 33471991), and in a small case-control study of epithelial ovarian cancer in 2 of 3236 cases and 1 of 3431 controls (PMID: 26315354). It has been reported in other individuals with breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancer (25186627, 27443514, 29945567, 32885271). This variant is present in two individuals in a database of women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (FLOSSIES database, https://whi.color.com/). In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

Malignant tumor of breast

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

The BARD1 p.Lys706Glu variant was identified in 3 of 7234 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004) from individuals or families with epithelial ovarian cancer or endometrial carcinoma and was present in 1 of 6862 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002) from healthy individuals (Ramus 2015, Ring 2016). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs149262370) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics and two clinical laboratories), MutDB, and in Zhejiang University databases (1x). The variant was identified in control databases in 26 of 277080 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00009 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 24032 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), European in 25 of 126608 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), while the variant was not observed in the Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Lys706 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.20

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.25

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.30

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.048

T;.;.;.;T;.

Eigen

Benign

0.17

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.31

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;D;D;D;D;.

M_CAP

Benign

0.030

MetaRNN

Benign

0.18

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.83

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

L;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.39

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.40

N;.;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.077

Sift

Benign

0.20

T;.;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.080

T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.79

P;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.21

MVP

0.89

MPC

0.23

ClinPred

0.14

GERP RS

4.6

Varity_R

0.66

gMVP

0.52

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over