2-214781425-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP3BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.449G>A(p.Arg150Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,613,346 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R150G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.13

Variant links:

Genes affected

BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

BARD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.753

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
BARD1	NM_000465.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.449G>A	p.Arg150Gln	missense_variant	4/11	ENST00000260947.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
BARD1	ENST00000260947.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.449G>A	p.Arg150Gln	missense_variant	4/11	1	NM_000465.4	P2	Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000658

AC:

AN:

152052

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000239

AC:

AN:

250782

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000295

AC XY:

AN XY:

135544

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

1461294

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000825

AC XY:

AN XY:

726910

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000928

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000809

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000658

AC:

AN:

152052

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74272

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000487

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ExAC

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 19, 2024	This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 150 of the BARD1 protein (p.Arg150Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs730881412, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BARD1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 182037). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Baylor Genetics	Aug 06, 2023	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Jun 20, 2023	The p.R150Q variant (also known as c.449G>A), located in coding exon 4 of the BARD1 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 449. The arginine at codon 150 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Oct 02, 2023	This missense variant replaces arginine with glutamine at codon 150 of the BARD1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. In a large breast cancer case-control meta analysis, this variant was identified in 1/60465 cases and was absent from the unaffected control cohort (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BARD1_000439). This variant has been identified in 6/250782 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Mar 13, 2023

Variant summary: BARD1 c.449G>A (p.Arg150Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.4e-05 in 250782 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.449G>A in individuals affected with Breast Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Dec 22, 2021

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.36

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.096

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.14

Cadd

Pathogenic

Dann

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.34

T;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.70

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.67

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.97

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.94

D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.12

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.75

D;D

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.55

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.9

M;.

MutationTaster

Benign

0.98

D;D

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.57

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.9

N;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.38

Sift

Uncertain

0.018

D;.

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0040

D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.

Vest4

0.69

MVP

0.96

MPC

0.47

ClinPred

0.83

GERP RS

5.2

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.47

gMVP

0.47

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.050

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over