2-29717663-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004304.5(ALK):c.702T>A(p.Pro234Pro) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.773 in 1,613,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 494,258 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P234P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004304.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALK | ENST00000389048.8 | c.702T>A | p.Pro234Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 2 of 29 | 1 | NM_004304.5 | ENSP00000373700.3 | ||
| ALK | ENST00000618119.4 | c.-430T>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 28 | 5 | ENSP00000482733.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.640 AC: 97210AN: 151990Hom.: 35610 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.741 AC: 186258AN: 251412 AF XY: 0.750 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.786 AC: 1149377AN: 1461526Hom.: 458650 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.786 AC XY: 571704AN XY: 727086 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.639 AC: 97206AN: 152108Hom.: 35608 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.640 AC XY: 47592AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:6
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
not provided Benign:2
- -
Variant summary: The variant of interest causes a synonymous change involving a conserved nucleotide with 5/5 in silico programs via Alamut predicting no significant effect on splicing. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 89037/121392 (34225 homozygotes) indicating that the variant of interest is the major allele (allele most commonly observed in the general population). Therefore, the variant of interest is classified as Benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at