2-29717663-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004304.5(ALK):​c.702T>A​(p.Pro234Pro) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.773 in 1,613,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 494,258 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P234P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.64 ( 35608 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.79 ( 458650 hom. )

Consequence

ALK
NM_004304.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.80

Publications

36 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALK (HGNC:427): (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, which belongs to the insulin receptor superfamily. This protein comprises an extracellular domain, an hydrophobic stretch corresponding to a single pass transmembrane region, and an intracellular kinase domain. It plays an important role in the development of the brain and exerts its effects on specific neurons in the nervous system. This gene has been found to be rearranged, mutated, or amplified in a series of tumours including anaplastic large cell lymphomas, neuroblastoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. The chromosomal rearrangements are the most common genetic alterations in this gene, which result in creation of multiple fusion genes in tumourigenesis, including ALK (chromosome 2)/EML4 (chromosome 2), ALK/RANBP2 (chromosome 2), ALK/ATIC (chromosome 2), ALK/TFG (chromosome 3), ALK/NPM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/SQSTM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/KIF5B (chromosome 10), ALK/CLTC (chromosome 17), ALK/TPM4 (chromosome 19), and ALK/MSN (chromosome X).[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
ALK Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 2-29717663-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29717663-A-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 259274.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.808 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALKNM_004304.5 linkc.702T>A p.Pro234Pro synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 29 ENST00000389048.8 NP_004295.2 Q9UM73B6D4Y2
ALKXR_001738688.3 linkn.1629T>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 18

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALKENST00000389048.8 linkc.702T>A p.Pro234Pro synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 29 1 NM_004304.5 ENSP00000373700.3 Q9UM73
ALKENST00000618119.4 linkc.-430T>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 28 5 ENSP00000482733.1 A0A087WZL3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.640
AC:
97210
AN:
151990
Hom.:
35610
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.251
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.917
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.823
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.764
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.707
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.737
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.718
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.813
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.707
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.741
AC:
186258
AN:
251412
AF XY:
0.750
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.235
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.729
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.820
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.745
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.747
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.814
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.782
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.786
AC:
1149377
AN:
1461526
Hom.:
458650
Cov.:
47
AF XY:
0.786
AC XY:
571704
AN XY:
727086
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.224
AC:
7505
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.730
AC:
32645
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.824
AC:
21521
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.785
AC:
31156
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.711
AC:
61290
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.752
AC:
40145
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.788
AC:
4543
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.813
AC:
904177
AN:
1111696
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.768
AC:
46395
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13189
26378
39567
52756
65945
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20722
41444
62166
82888
103610
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.639
AC:
97206
AN:
152108
Hom.:
35608
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.640
AC XY:
47592
AN XY:
74338
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.250
AC:
10379
AN:
41500
American (AMR)
AF:
0.720
AC:
11003
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.823
AC:
2856
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.763
AC:
3941
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.706
AC:
3393
AN:
4808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.737
AC:
7785
AN:
10570
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.721
AC:
212
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.813
AC:
55300
AN:
67998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.710
AC:
1501
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1328
2656
3985
5313
6641
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
750
1500
2250
3000
3750
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.762
Hom.:
12215
Bravo
AF:
0.622
Asia WGS
AF:
0.734
AC:
2553
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.815
EpiControl
AF:
0.824

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:6
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 23, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Mar 02, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 27, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The variant of interest causes a synonymous change involving a conserved nucleotide with 5/5 in silico programs via Alamut predicting no significant effect on splicing. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 89037/121392 (34225 homozygotes) indicating that the variant of interest is the major allele (allele most commonly observed in the general population). Therefore, the variant of interest is classified as Benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Dec 08, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
8.0
DANN
Benign
0.50
PhyloP100
3.8
PromoterAI
-0.0054
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2246745; hg19: chr2-29940529; COSMIC: COSV66584548; API