20-63928420-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_025219.3(DNAJC5):c.75C>T(p.Asn25Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000083 in 1,614,076 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000081 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

DNAJC5
NM_025219.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.09

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAJC5 (HGNC:16235): (DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C5) This gene is a member of the J protein family. J proteins function in many cellular processes by regulating the ATPase activity of 70 kDa heat shock proteins. The encoded protein plays a role in membrane trafficking and protein folding, and has been shown to have anti-neurodegenerative properties. The encoded protein is known to play a role in cystic fibrosis and Huntington's disease. A pseudogene of this gene is located on the short arm of chromosome 8. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2010]

DNAJC5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 4 (Kufs type)
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
adult neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen

DNAJC5 links:

ENSG00000290226 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000290226 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.33).

BP6

Variant 20-63928420-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-63928420-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 290991.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.09 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 16 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAJC5	NM_025219.3 link	c.75C>T	p.Asn25Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 5	ENST00000360864.9	NP_079495.1	Q9H3Z4-1Q6AHX3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAJC5	ENST00000360864.9 link	c.75C>T	p.Asn25Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 5	1	NM_025219.3	ENSP00000354111.4	Q9H3Z4-1
DNAJC5	ENST00000470551.1 link	n.75C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 6	2		ENSP00000434744.1	Q9H3Z4-2
ENSG00000290226	ENST00000703636.1 link	n.539C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 5 of 5
DNAJC5	ENST00000703637.1 link	n.75C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 6			ENSP00000515413.1	Q9H3Z4-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000290

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000384

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000167

AC:

AN:

251338

AF XY:

0.000169

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00120

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000807

AC:

118

AN:

1461756

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000908

AC XY:

AN XY:

727158

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000149

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00156

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000185

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53300

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000198

AC:

AN:

1112002

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000132

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152320

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000940

AC XY:

AN XY:

74482

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

41564

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000385

AC:

AN:

5194

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.469

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000532

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000117

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1

Sep 22, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Jul 10, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

May 09, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

Benign:1

Dec 30, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.33

CADD

Benign

8.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.65

PhyloP100

-1.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.6

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over