22-50237830-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_020461.4(TUBGCP6):c.905+2374A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.309 in 152,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,239 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020461.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- microcephaly and chorioretinopathy 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020461.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUBGCP6 | NM_020461.4 | MANE Select | c.905+2374A>G | intron | N/A | NP_065194.3 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUBGCP6 | ENST00000248846.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.905+2374A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000248846.5 | |||
| TUBGCP6 | ENST00000439308.7 | TSL:1 | n.905+2374A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000397387.2 | |||
| TUBGCP6 | ENST00000498611.5 | TSL:1 | n.1438+2374A>G | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.309 AC: 46985AN: 151974Hom.: 8241 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.309 AC: 46978AN: 152092Hom.: 8239 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.308 AC XY: 22941AN XY: 74368 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at