5-112841981-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000038.6(APC):c.6387G>A(p.Ser2129Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000713 in 1,612,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S2129S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000075 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.794

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

APC Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
desmoid tumor
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
familial adenomatous polyposis 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
sarcoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
APC-related attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Turcot syndrome with polyposis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

APC links:

ENSG00000258864 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000258864 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).

BP6

Variant 5-112841981-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112841981-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 183971.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.794 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
APC	NM_000038.6 link	c.6387G>A	p.Ser2129Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 16	ENST00000257430.9	NP_000029.2	P25054-1Q4LE70

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
APC	ENST00000257430.9 link	c.6387G>A	p.Ser2129Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 16	5	NM_000038.6	ENSP00000257430.4		P25054-1
ENSG00000258864	ENST00000520401.1 link	n.228+13009G>A		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 7	3		ENSP00000454861.1		H3BNH8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000395

AC:

AN:

152082

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000197

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000307

AC:

AN:

250810

AF XY:

0.000258

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00205

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000746

AC:

109

AN:

1460696

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000688

AC XY:

AN XY:

726796

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33440

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00159

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26120

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39682

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86230

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53382

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000243

AC:

AN:

1110996

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000994

AC:

AN:

60362

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000395

AC:

AN:

152082

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74300

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41400

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000197

AC:

AN:

15260

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5194

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.517

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000107

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000945

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:4

Dec 09, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 14, 2024

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 09, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

May 03, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1

Benign:3

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 04, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

not provided

Benign:3

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 26, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The APC c.6387G>A (p.Ser2129Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide, 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 34/121086 (1/3561), predominantly in the Latino cohort, 30/11544 (1/384), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic APC variant of 1/14005. Therefore, suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in population(s) of Latino origin. The variant of interest has not been, to our knowledge, reported in affected individuals via publications, although multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories cite the variant with a classification of "likely benign/benign." Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. -

May 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

APC: BP4, BP7 -

not specified

Benign:1

Jan 20, 2020

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis

Benign:1

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The APC p.Ser2129= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the COGR, Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, UMD-LSDB, or in Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs374310157) as "With other allele ", and in ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, Color Genomics, Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, and one clinical laboratory), databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 80 of 276588 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.00015), Latino in 72 of 34390 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), European in 6 of 126234 chromosomes (freq: 0.000048), and South Asian in 1 of 30774 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003); it was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and in Finnish populations. The p.Ser2129= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.77

CADD

Benign

0.65

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.60

PhyloP100

-0.79

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over