5-132609390-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):ā€‹c.3030A>Gā€‹(p.Thr1010=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000684 in 1,461,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000068 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.31
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 5-132609390-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132609390-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 414954.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.31 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RAD50NM_005732.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3030A>G p.Thr1010= synonymous_variant 19/25 ENST00000378823.8 NP_005723.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RAD50ENST00000378823.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3030A>G p.Thr1010= synonymous_variant 19/251 NM_005732.4 ENSP00000368100 P1Q92878-1
RAD50ENST00000533482.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*2656A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 19/251 ENSP00000431225
RAD50ENST00000651723.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.*3113A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 19/20 ENSP00000498237
RAD50ENST00000651160.1 linkuse as main transcript downstream_gene_variant ENSP00000498829

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000120
AC:
3
AN:
251008
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000147
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135700
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000981
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000684
AC:
10
AN:
1461370
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000124
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
726986
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 26, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpAug 01, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
7.8
DANN
Benign
0.78
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.6

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs771112938; hg19: chr5-131945082; API