5-180624003-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_182925.5(FLT4):c.1480A>T(p.Thr494Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000062 in 1,613,302 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T494M) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182925.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- lymphatic malformation 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- capillary infantile hemangiomaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- congenital heart defects, multiple types, 7Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- lymphatic malformationInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- tetralogy of fallotInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000359 AC: 9AN: 250354 AF XY: 0.0000368 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000616 AC: 9AN: 1461160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 726890 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at