5-96776379-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_001040458.3(ERAP1):c.*17A>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.317 in 1,599,214 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 85,794 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001040458.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERAP1 | ENST00000443439.7 | c.*17A>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 19 of 19 | 1 | NM_001040458.3 | ENSP00000406304.2 | |||
ERAP1 | ENST00000296754.7 | c.2818+25A>C | intron_variant | Intron 19 of 19 | 1 | ENSP00000296754.3 | ||||
CAST | ENST00000510098.1 | n.*351-489T>G | intron_variant | Intron 10 of 11 | 1 | ENSP00000427195.1 | ||||
ERAP1 | ENST00000512852.1 | c.352+25A>C | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 3 | 3 | ENSP00000425381.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.258 AC: 39206AN: 152064Hom.: 5842 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.262 AC: 64000AN: 243868 AF XY: 0.269 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.323 AC: 467042AN: 1447032Hom.: 79945 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.321 AC XY: 230451AN XY: 717808 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.258 AC: 39219AN: 152182Hom.: 5849 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.252 AC XY: 18725AN XY: 74402 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 38% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 33. Only high quality variants are reported. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at