6-152401259-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 1P and 3B. PP2BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting
The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.6908C>A(p.Thr2303Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,613,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182961.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | NM_182961.4 | c.6908C>A | p.Thr2303Lys | missense_variant | 47/146 | ENST00000367255.10 | NP_892006.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | ENST00000367255.10 | c.6908C>A | p.Thr2303Lys | missense_variant | 47/146 | 1 | NM_182961.4 | ENSP00000356224 | P1 | |
SYNE1 | ENST00000423061.6 | c.6929C>A | p.Thr2310Lys | missense_variant | 47/146 | 1 | ENSP00000396024 | |||
SYNE1 | ENST00000461872.6 | n.7126C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 45/55 | 1 | |||||
SYNE1 | ENST00000535081.1 | downstream_gene_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461768Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727180
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74338
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 11, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at