7-41966271-C-T

Variant names:

• chr7-41966271-C-T
• rs61730503
• NM_000168.6:c.2802G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_000168.6(GLI3):​c.2802G>A​(p.Ala934Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000909 in 1,607,900 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0049 (6 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00049 (4 hom.)
• Consequence: GLI3 NM_000168.6 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -3.03

Genes affected

GLI3 (HGNC:4319): (GLI family zinc finger 3) This gene encodes a protein which belongs to the C2H2-type zinc finger proteins subclass of the Gli family. They are characterized as DNA-binding transcription factors and are mediators of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. The protein encoded by this gene localizes in the cytoplasm and activates patched Drosophila homolog (PTCH) gene expression. It is also thought to play a role during embryogenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with several diseases, including Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome, Pallister-Hall syndrome, preaxial polydactyly type IV, and postaxial polydactyly types A1 and B. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
• BP6: Variant 7-41966271-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-41966271-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 255432.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.03 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00491 (748/152290) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0165 (687/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0155. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 328 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 748 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GLI3	NM_000168.6	c.2802G>A	p.Ala934Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 15	ENST00000395925.8	NP_000159.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GLI3	ENST00000395925.8	c.2802G>A	p.Ala934Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 15	5	NM_000168.6	ENSP00000379258.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00486 AC: 740 AN: 152174 Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0164

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00327

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00430

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00124 AC: 289 AN: 232892 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000841 AC XY: 108 AN XY: 128398

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0180

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000848

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000290

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000348

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000490 AC: 713 AN: 1455610 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000421 AC XY: 305 AN XY: 724520

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0176

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000941

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000104

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000171

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000831

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00491 AC: 748 AN: 152290 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00440 AC XY: 328 AN XY: 74472

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0165

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00327

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00425

Alfa AF: 0.00134 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00519

Asia WGS AF: 0.000289 AC: 1 AN: 3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:1

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Pallister-Hall syndrome;C0265306:Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:1

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1

Mar 13, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Pallister-Hall syndrome;C0265306:Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome;C1868111:Polysyndactyly 4;C4282400:Polydactyly, postaxial, type A1 Benign:1

Sep 27, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Polydactyly Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Pallister-Hall syndrome Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.65
CADD	Benign	0.043
DANN	Benign	0.81

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61730503; hg19: chr7-42005869;