7-66638322-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_153033.5(KCTD7):​c.384G>A​(p.Glu128=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00203 in 1,614,252 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

KCTD7
NM_153033.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCTD7 (HGNC:21957): (potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 7) This gene encodes a member of the potassium channel tetramerization domain-containing protein family. Family members are identified on a structural basis and contain an amino-terminal domain similar to the T1 domain present in the voltage-gated potassium channel. Mutations in this gene have been associated with progressive myoclonic epilepsy-3. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 7-66638322-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-66638322-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 138057.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr7-66638322-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.08 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00146 (222/152362) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00228 (155/68036). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00198. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 100 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KCTD7NM_153033.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.384G>A p.Glu128= synonymous_variant 3/4 ENST00000639828.2
KCTD7NM_001167961.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.384G>A p.Glu128= synonymous_variant 3/5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KCTD7ENST00000639828.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.384G>A p.Glu128= synonymous_variant 3/42 NM_153033.5 A1Q96MP8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00146
AC:
222
AN:
152244
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00518
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00148
AC:
372
AN:
251490
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00154
AC XY:
209
AN XY:
135918
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00516
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000416
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00201
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00212
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00209
AC:
3053
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00204
AC XY:
1481
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00513
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000487
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00240
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00209
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00146
AC:
222
AN:
152362
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00134
AC XY:
100
AN XY:
74514
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00518
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00176
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00152
EpiCase
AF:
0.00164
EpiControl
AF:
0.00231

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2022KCTD7: BP4, BP7, BS2 -
Progressive myoclonic epilepsy type 3 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 20, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 11, 2017- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 15, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
7.6
DANN
Benign
0.95

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145238250; hg19: chr7-66103309; COSMIC: COSV99299017; COSMIC: COSV99299017; API