8-144516654-G-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_004260.4(RECQL4):c.465C>G(p.Val155Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000977 in 1,603,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V155V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0051 ( 13 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00055 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

RECQL4
NM_004260.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.63

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RECQL4 (HGNC:9949): (RecQ like helicase 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a DNA helicase that belongs to the RecQ helicase family. DNA helicases unwind double-stranded DNA into single-stranded DNAs and may modulate chromosome segregation. This gene is predominantly expressed in thymus and testis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Rothmund-Thomson, RAPADILINO and Baller-Gerold syndromes. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

RECQL4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Baller-Gerold syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet
Rothmund-Thomson syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Rothmund-Thomson syndrome type 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
osteosarcoma
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
rapadilino syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp

RECQL4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).

BP6

Variant 8-144516654-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-144516654-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 239776.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.63 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00506 (771/152320) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0167 (696/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0157. There are 13 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 368 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 13 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RECQL4	NM_004260.4 link	c.465C>G	p.Val155Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 21	ENST00000617875.6	NP_004251.4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RECQL4	ENST00000617875.6 link	c.465C>G	p.Val155Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 21	1	NM_004260.4	ENSP00000482313.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00497

AC:

757

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0165

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00445

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00128

AC:

307

AN:

239198

AF XY:

0.000972

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0163

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00148

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000647

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000699

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000549

AC:

796

AN:

1451082

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000506

AC XY:

365

AN XY:

721172

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0165

AC:

544

AN:

32936

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00154

AC:

AN:

43450

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25506

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39582

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000702

AC:

AN:

85460

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51762

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00385

AC:

AN:

5710

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000605

AC:

AN:

1106806

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00150

AC:

AN:

59870

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

148

197

246

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00506

AC:

771

AN:

152320

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00494

AC XY:

368

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0167

AC:

696

AN:

41568

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00444

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68022

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.504

Heterozygous variant carriers

128

170

213

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000588

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00614

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 15, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

Dec 30, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Rapadilino syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Rothmund-Thomson syndrome type 2

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Baller-Gerold syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.86

CADD

Benign

1.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.70

PhyloP100

1.6

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.14

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over