9-108929883-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_003640.5(ELP1):​c.189C>T​(p.Leu63Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0216 in 1,613,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 458 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L63L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 32 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.022 ( 426 hom. )

Consequence

ELP1
NM_003640.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0500

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ELP1 (HGNC:5959): (elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a scaffold protein and a regulator for three different kinases involved in proinflammatory signaling. The encoded protein can bind NF-kappa-B-inducing kinase and I-kappa-B kinases through separate domains and assemble them into an active kinase complex. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dysautonomia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
ELP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary dysautonomia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health
  • Riley-Day syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 9-108929883-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108929883-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 137581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.05 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0179 (2732/152284) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0246 (1674/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0236. There are 32 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1339 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 32 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ELP1NM_003640.5 linkc.189C>T p.Leu63Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 37 ENST00000374647.10 NP_003631.2 O95163Q4LE38Q8N516
ELP1XM_047423991.1 linkc.189C>T p.Leu63Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 25 XP_047279947.1
ELP1NM_001318360.2 linkc.-154C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 37 NP_001305289.1 O95163A0A6Q8PGW3B4E3I9
ELP1NM_001330749.2 linkc.-671C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 35 NP_001317678.1 F5H2T0B3KNB2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ELP1ENST00000374647.10 linkc.189C>T p.Leu63Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 37 1 NM_003640.5 ENSP00000363779.5 O95163

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0179
AC:
2723
AN:
152166
Hom.:
32
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0123
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00765
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0239
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0246
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0182
AC:
4566
AN:
251482
AF XY:
0.0185
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00650
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0243
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0279
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0197
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0220
AC:
32184
AN:
1461558
Hom.:
426
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0213
AC XY:
15494
AN XY:
727082
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0116
AC:
387
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00653
AC:
292
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0123
AC:
321
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000126
AC:
5
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00749
AC:
646
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0237
AC:
1268
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0108
AC:
60
AN:
5540
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0253
AC:
28099
AN:
1111976
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0183
AC:
1106
AN:
60358
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1666
3332
4997
6663
8329
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1010
2020
3030
4040
5050
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0179
AC:
2732
AN:
152284
Hom.:
32
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0180
AC XY:
1339
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0119
AC:
494
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0123
AC:
188
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
41
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00766
AC:
37
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0239
AC:
254
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0246
AC:
1674
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0142
AC:
30
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
133
267
400
534
667
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0185
Hom.:
37
Bravo
AF:
0.0167
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00606
AC:
21
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0239
EpiControl
AF:
0.0202

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Apr 03, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 28, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial dysautonomia Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

May 20, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
5.6
DANN
Benign
0.75
PhyloP100
0.050
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2230786; hg19: chr9-111692163; API