9-128633958-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 5P and 1B. PM1PM2PP5BP4
The NM_052844.4(DYNC2I2):āc.1397A>Cā(p.Gln466Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000992 in 1,613,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_052844.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNC2I2 | NM_052844.4 | c.1397A>C | p.Gln466Pro | missense_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000372715.7 | |
DYNC2I2 | XM_047424057.1 | c.1397A>C | p.Gln466Pro | missense_variant | 10/10 | ||
DYNC2I2 | XM_011519179.3 | c.1313A>C | p.Gln438Pro | missense_variant | 10/10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNC2I2 | ENST00000372715.7 | c.1397A>C | p.Gln466Pro | missense_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_052844.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000890 AC: 13AN: 1460716Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 726660
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152338Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74510
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3 Pathogenic:2
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | University of Washington Center for Mendelian Genomics, University of Washington | - | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | Dan Cohn Lab, University Of California Los Angeles | Jun 01, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at