9-136508242-C-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_017617.5(NOTCH1):c.3315G>T(p.Ala1105Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000829 in 1,611,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 4 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00079 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

NOTCH1
NM_017617.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.29

Variant links:

Genes affected

NOTCH1 (HGNC:7881): (notch receptor 1) This gene encodes a member of the NOTCH family of proteins. Members of this Type I transmembrane protein family share structural characteristics including an extracellular domain consisting of multiple epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats, and an intracellular domain consisting of multiple different domain types. Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved intercellular signaling pathway that regulates interactions between physically adjacent cells through binding of Notch family receptors to their cognate ligands. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed in the trans-Golgi network to generate two polypeptide chains that heterodimerize to form the mature cell-surface receptor. This receptor plays a role in the development of numerous cell and tissue types. Mutations in this gene are associated with aortic valve disease, Adams-Oliver syndrome, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

NOTCH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).

BP6

Variant 9-136508242-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-136508242-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 221096.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-136508242-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr9-136508242-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.29 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00122 (186/152264) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0304 (157/5170). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0265. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 105 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 186 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NOTCH1	NM_017617.5 link	c.3315G>T	p.Ala1105Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 34	ENST00000651671.1	NP_060087.3	P46531
NOTCH1	XM_011518717.3 link	c.2592G>T	p.Ala864Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 31		XP_011517019.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NOTCH1	ENST00000651671.1 link	c.3315G>T	p.Ala1105Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 34		NM_017617.5	ENSP00000498587.1		P46531

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00122

AC:

186

AN:

152146

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000507

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0303

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00265

AC:

654

AN:

246598

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00237

AC XY:

318

AN XY:

134448

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000588

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0349

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000359

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000998

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000788

AC:

1150

AN:

1459394

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000718

AC XY:

521

AN XY:

725966

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000448

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000448

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0245

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000225

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00209

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00122

AC:

186

AN:

152264

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00141

AC XY:

105

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000506

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0304

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000947

Alfa

AF:

0.000314

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00141

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0110

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Mar 30, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 28, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:2

Oct 16, 2018

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 04, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:2

Jun 14, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Adams-Oliver syndrome 5

Benign:2

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 15, 2022

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aortic valve disease 1

Benign:1

Mar 15, 2022

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.77

CADD

Benign

0.0070

DANN

Benign

0.47

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over