9-95476076-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.1686C>T(p.Ala562Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.195 in 1,613,506 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33,080 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.15 ( 2388 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.20 ( 30692 hom. )
Consequence
PTCH1
NM_000264.5 synonymous
NM_000264.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -5.48
Genes affected
PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 9-95476076-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95476076-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 255670.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-95476076-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.48 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.218 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTCH1 | NM_000264.5 | c.1686C>T | p.Ala562Ala | synonymous_variant | 12/24 | ENST00000331920.11 | NP_000255.2 | |
PTCH1 | NM_001083603.3 | c.1683C>T | p.Ala561Ala | synonymous_variant | 12/24 | ENST00000437951.6 | NP_001077072.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTCH1 | ENST00000331920.11 | c.1686C>T | p.Ala562Ala | synonymous_variant | 12/24 | 5 | NM_000264.5 | ENSP00000332353.6 | ||
PTCH1 | ENST00000437951.6 | c.1683C>T | p.Ala561Ala | synonymous_variant | 12/24 | 5 | NM_001083603.3 | ENSP00000389744.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.154 AC: 23346AN: 152046Hom.: 2385 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
23346
AN:
152046
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.172 AC: 43045AN: 250444Hom.: 4273 AF XY: 0.178 AC XY: 24033AN XY: 135360
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
43045
AN:
250444
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
24033
AN XY:
135360
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.199 AC: 290845AN: 1461342Hom.: 30692 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.199 AC XY: 144598AN XY: 726946
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
290845
AN:
1461342
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
144598
AN XY:
726946
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.153 AC: 23345AN: 152164Hom.: 2388 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.153 AC XY: 11371AN XY: 74394
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
23345
AN:
152164
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
11371
AN XY:
74394
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
341
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 24, 2016 | Variant summary: The PTCH1 c.1686C>T (p.Ala562Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with 4/5 splice prediction tools predicting no significant impact on splicing or ESE binding, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 20642/118716 (2070 homozygotes, 1/5, frequency: 0.1738772), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic PTCH1 variant of 1/58479 (0.0000171), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, the variant has been indicated to co-occur with other pathogenic PTCH1 variants, c.2011_2012dup and c.3050_3051del, in affected individuals via publications. Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest is classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Gorlin syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 03, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Holoprosencephaly 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at