NM_000091.5:c.3566-9T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000091.5(COL4A3):​c.3566-9T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00287 in 1,603,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

COL4A3
NM_000091.5 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00003890
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.523

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL4A3 (HGNC:2204): (collagen type IV alpha 3 chain) Type IV collagen, the major structural component of basement membranes, is a multimeric protein composed of 3 alpha subunits. These subunits are encoded by 6 different genes, alpha 1 through alpha 6, each of which can form a triple helix structure with 2 other subunits to form type IV collagen. This gene encodes alpha 3. In the Goodpasture syndrome, autoantibodies bind to the collagen molecules in the basement membranes of alveoli and glomeruli. The epitopes that elicit these autoantibodies are localized largely to the non-collagenous C-terminal domain of the protein. A specific kinase phosphorylates amino acids in this same C-terminal region and the expression of this kinase is upregulated during pathogenesis. This gene is also linked to an autosomal recessive form of Alport syndrome. The mutations contributing to this syndrome are also located within the exons that encode this C-terminal region. Like the other members of the type IV collagen gene family, this gene is organized in a head-to-head conformation with another type IV collagen gene so that each gene pair shares a common promoter. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
MFF-DT (HGNC:41067): (MFF divergent transcript)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 2-227297665-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-227297665-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 334775.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.00298 (4318/1450778) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00369 (4091/1107740). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0036. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 2089 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AD,AR,SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL4A3NM_000091.5 linkc.3566-9T>C intron_variant Intron 41 of 51 ENST00000396578.8 NP_000082.2 Q01955-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL4A3ENST00000396578.8 linkc.3566-9T>C intron_variant Intron 41 of 51 1 NM_000091.5 ENSP00000379823.3 Q01955-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00189
AC:
287
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00126
AC:
287
AN:
227584
AF XY:
0.00118
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000442
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000615
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000105
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00298
AC:
4318
AN:
1450778
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00290
AC XY:
2089
AN XY:
720314
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000479
AC:
16
AN:
33390
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000603
AC:
26
AN:
43086
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000776
AC:
2
AN:
25782
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39504
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
83580
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000759
AC:
4
AN:
52674
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000390
AC:
2
AN:
5128
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00369
AC:
4091
AN:
1107740
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00296
AC:
177
AN:
59894
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.448
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
221
443
664
886
1107
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
162
324
486
648
810
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00188
AC:
287
AN:
152326
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00162
AC XY:
121
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000722
AC:
30
AN:
41580
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
16
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
1
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00350
AC:
238
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15
29
44
58
73
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00174
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00181
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Oct 23, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 15, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 29, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 13, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Alport syndrome Uncertain:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nov 11, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
4.9
DANN
Benign
0.66
PhyloP100
0.52
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000039
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147886850; hg19: chr2-228162381; API