NM_000249.4:c.1964T>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM1PM2
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.1964T>A(p.Ile655Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I655T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000249.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Lynch syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
- Lynch syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
- Muir-Torre syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet
- mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
- Lynch syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- malignant pancreatic neoplasmInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- rhabdomyosarcomaInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- prostate cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- breast cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLH1 | NM_000249.4 | c.1964T>A | p.Ile655Asn | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 19 | ENST00000231790.8 | NP_000240.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLH1 | ENST00000231790.8 | c.1964T>A | p.Ile655Asn | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 19 | 1 | NM_000249.4 | ENSP00000231790.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.I655N variant (also known as c.1964T>A), located in coding exon 17 of the MLH1 gene, results from a T to A substitution at nucleotide position 1964. The isoleucine at codon 655 is replaced by asparagine, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This alteration has been reported in conjunction with a pathogenic mutation in MSH2 in a Latvian individual suspected of HNPCC and having a personal history of colorectal cancer (Irmejs A et al. Anticancer Res.; 27:653-8). This variant was not reported in population based cohorts in the following databases: Database of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (dbSNP), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), and 1000 Genomes Project. In the ESP, this variant was not observed in 6503 samples (13006 alleles) with coverage at this position. To date, this alteration has been detected with an allele frequency of approximately 0.001% (greater than 150000 alleles tested) in our clinical cohort. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be borderline deleteriuos by MAPP-MMR in silico analyses (Chao E et al. Hum Mutat. 2008 Jun;29(6):852-60). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at