NM_000381.4:c.1663A>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_000381.4(MID1):c.1663A>G(p.Ile555Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000108 in 1,199,830 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 3 hemizygotes in GnomAD. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I555L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000381.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- X-linked Opitz G/BBB syndromeInheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MID1 | NM_000381.4 | c.1663A>G | p.Ile555Val | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 10 | ENST00000317552.9 | NP_000372.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000268 AC: 3AN: 112000Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000558 AC: 1AN: 179208 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000919 AC: 10AN: 1087830Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00000566 AC XY: 2AN XY: 353490 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000268 AC: 3AN: 112000Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0000293 AC XY: 1AN XY: 34164 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
X-linked Opitz G/BBB syndrome Pathogenic:1
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: MID1 c.1663A>G (p.Ile555Val) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the B30.2/SPRY domain (IPR001870) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.1e-05 in 1199830 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 1.8e-05 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation and including 3 hemizygous males, in the gnomAD database. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1663A>G has been reported in the literature in at least one hemizygote affected with Opitz G/BBB syndrome (e.g., Ferrentino_2007). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 17221865). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 547526). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
not provided Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 555 of the MID1 protein (p.Ile555Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs398123341, gnomAD 0.001%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Opitz G/BBB syndrome (PMID: 17221865). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 547526). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt MID1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at