NM_001164211.2:c.452+846G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001164211.2(LRCH1):c.452+846G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.593 in 152,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26,722 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164211.2 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001164211.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCH1 | NM_001164211.2 | MANE Select | c.452+846G>A | intron | N/A | NP_001157683.2 | |||
| LRCH1 | NM_015116.3 | c.452+846G>A | intron | N/A | NP_055931.2 | ||||
| LRCH1 | NM_001164213.2 | c.452+846G>A | intron | N/A | NP_001157685.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCH1 | ENST00000389797.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.452+846G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000374447.3 | |||
| LRCH1 | ENST00000389798.7 | TSL:1 | c.452+846G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000374448.3 | |||
| LRCH1 | ENST00000311191.10 | TSL:1 | c.452+846G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000308493.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.593 AC: 90075AN: 151912Hom.: 26694 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.593 AC: 90145AN: 152032Hom.: 26722 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.597 AC XY: 44345AN XY: 74332 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at