NM_001267550.2:c.14525G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.14525G>A​(p.Arg4842Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0669 in 1,613,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,116 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R4842R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.11 ( 1400 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.062 ( 4716 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.507

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0045004487).
BP6
Variant 2-178735921-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178735921-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 46586.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.213 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.14525G>A p.Arg4842Lys missense_variant Exon 50 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.14525G>A p.Arg4842Lys missense_variant Exon 50 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.111
AC:
16910
AN:
152018
Hom.:
1383
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.215
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0482
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.162
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0712
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.189
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0483
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0511
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0481
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.100
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0995
AC:
24778
AN:
248924
AF XY:
0.0877
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.215
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.252
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0717
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.209
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0524
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0475
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0813
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0623
AC:
91014
AN:
1461590
Hom.:
4716
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.0603
AC XY:
43841
AN XY:
727086
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.220
AC:
7373
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.241
AC:
10783
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0720
AC:
1882
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.190
AC:
7525
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0424
AC:
3659
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0547
AC:
2920
AN:
53398
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0352
AC:
203
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0471
AC:
52324
AN:
1111788
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0720
AC:
4345
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5317
10633
15950
21266
26583
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2284
4568
6852
9136
11420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.112
AC:
16986
AN:
152136
Hom.:
1400
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.112
AC XY:
8332
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.216
AC:
8975
AN:
41484
American (AMR)
AF:
0.162
AC:
2477
AN:
15270
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0712
AC:
247
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.189
AC:
976
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0485
AC:
234
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0511
AC:
542
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0340
AC:
10
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0481
AC:
3273
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0985
AC:
208
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
706
1412
2117
2823
3529
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
170
340
510
680
850
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0686
Hom.:
2065
Bravo
AF:
0.130
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0485
AC:
180
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0503
AC:
194
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.203
AC:
789
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0479
AC:
397
ExAC
AF:
0.0958
AC:
11573
Asia WGS
AF:
0.105
AC:
364
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0449
EpiControl
AF:
0.0475

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Jan 24, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Classified as benign based on high population frequency -

May 29, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 19, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 18, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Dec 17, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Aug 23, 2012
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.059
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.70
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
6.7
DANN
Benign
0.62
Eigen
Benign
-0.37
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.41
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.40
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.26
T;T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0045
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
PhyloP100
0.51
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.11
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.049
Sift
Benign
0.97
T;.;.;.
Vest4
0.017
ClinPred
0.0030
T
GERP RS
1.8
Mutation Taster
=94/6
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2742347; hg19: chr2-179600648; COSMIC: COSV59946464; COSMIC: COSV59946464; API