NM_001267550.2:c.32557C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.32557C>T(p.Pro10853Ser) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000232 in 1,613,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense, splice_region

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.19

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

TTN links:

TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

TTN-AS1 links:

LOC124906100 (HGNC:):

LOC124906100 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.023662448).

BP6

Variant 2-178684747-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178684747-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 46871.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2 link	c.32557C>T	p.Pro10853Ser	missense_variant, splice_region_variant	Exon 131 of 363	ENST00000589042.5	NP_001254479.2	A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5 link	c.32557C>T	p.Pro10853Ser	missense_variant, splice_region_variant	Exon 131 of 363	5	NM_001267550.2	ENSP00000467141.1		A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

151848

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000329

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000950

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000479

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000378

AC:

AN:

248664

AF XY:

0.000341

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00125

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000199

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000346

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00166

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000234

AC:

342

AN:

1461162

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000235

AC XY:

171

AN XY:

726820

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33446

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00137

AC:

AN:

44682

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000268

AC:

AN:

26104

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39674

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86134

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000375

AC:

AN:

53392

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00225

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

230

AN:

1111612

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000431

AC:

AN:

60352

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.455

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

151964

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000202

AC XY:

AN XY:

74260

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41466

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000328

AC:

AN:

15240

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000288

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4806

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000950

AC:

AN:

10530

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000338

AC:

AN:

67954

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000474

AC:

AN:

2108

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.517

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000382

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000344

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000123

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000389

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000600

EpiControl

AF:

0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:3Benign:3

Aug 14, 2020

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TTN: BP4 -

Sep 03, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 08, 2023

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 12, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Aug 28, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

proposed classification - variant undergoing re-assessment, contact laboratory -

Apr 09, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

TTN-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Dec 12, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The TTN c.32557C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Pro10853Ser. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.12% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD. Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype

Uncertain:1

Jan 22, 2013

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

There is insufficient or conflicting evidence for classification of this alteration. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Dec 08, 2020

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.22

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.35

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.32

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.93

Eigen

Benign

-0.033

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.098

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.80

LIST_S2

Benign

0.74

T;T;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.068

MetaRNN

Benign

0.024

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.66

PhyloP100

4.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.36

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.6

D;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.17

Sift

Benign

0.051

T;.;.;.

Polyphen

0.0060

.;.;B;B

Vest4

0.27

MVP

0.24

MPC

0.085

ClinPred

0.056

GERP RS

4.7

Mutation Taster

=81/19

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over