NM_001267550.2:c.97613G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.97613G>A​(p.Arg32538His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.153 in 1,612,826 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21,855 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R32538C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 1972 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.15 ( 19883 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

4
6
6

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.90

Publications

35 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0025874078).
BP6
Variant 2-178541464-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178541464-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47586.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.426 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.97613G>A p.Arg32538His missense_variant Exon 350 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.97613G>A p.Arg32538His missense_variant Exon 350 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.142
AC:
21507
AN:
151934
Hom.:
1966
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0754
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.473
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.128
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.170
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.440
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.257
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.163
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.114
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.145
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.126
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.175
AC:
43495
AN:
248024
AF XY:
0.179
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0703
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.171
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.429
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.152
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.159
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.154
AC:
224610
AN:
1460776
Hom.:
19883
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.157
AC XY:
113946
AN XY:
726608
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0712
AC:
2382
AN:
33444
American (AMR)
AF:
0.145
AC:
6485
AN:
44654
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.168
AC:
4380
AN:
26118
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.434
AC:
17186
AN:
39640
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.250
AC:
21577
AN:
86168
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.151
AC:
8062
AN:
53344
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.126
AC:
723
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.139
AC:
154027
AN:
1111332
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.162
AC:
9788
AN:
60316
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9744
19487
29231
38974
48718
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
5758
11516
17274
23032
28790
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.142
AC:
21517
AN:
152050
Hom.:
1972
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.146
AC XY:
10866
AN XY:
74290
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0752
AC:
3122
AN:
41504
American (AMR)
AF:
0.128
AC:
1949
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.170
AC:
591
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.441
AC:
2265
AN:
5140
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.256
AC:
1232
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.163
AC:
1717
AN:
10556
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.122
AC:
36
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.145
AC:
9889
AN:
67970
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.135
AC:
285
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.511
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
954
1908
2862
3816
4770
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
252
504
756
1008
1260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.149
Hom.:
4755
Bravo
AF:
0.137
TwinsUK
AF:
0.133
AC:
494
ALSPAC
AF:
0.140
AC:
538
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0732
AC:
289
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.145
AC:
1206
ExAC
AF:
0.175
AC:
21137
Asia WGS
AF:
0.341
AC:
1188
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.136
EpiControl
AF:
0.140

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 11, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 02, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 18, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Sep 24, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.33
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.20
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.86
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.85
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.97
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0026
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
.;.;.;M;.;.;M
PhyloP100
7.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.71
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.6
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.48
Sift
Uncertain
0.025
D;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.34
MPC
0.52
ClinPred
0.0075
T
GERP RS
5.7
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3731749; hg19: chr2-179406191; COSMIC: COSV59894639; COSMIC: COSV59894639; API