NM_001277115.2:c.106G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):c.106G>A(p.Glu36Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000123 in 1,305,462 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E36G) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001277115.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 7Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH11 | NM_001277115.2 | c.106G>A | p.Glu36Lys | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 82 | ENST00000409508.8 | NP_001264044.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152038Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000130 AC: 15AN: 1153308Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000882 AC XY: 5AN XY: 567012 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74372 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at