NM_001329.4:c.-205-9215T>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_001329.4(CTBP2):c.-205-9215T>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000591 in 152,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001329.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001329.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTBP2 | NM_001329.4 | MANE Select | c.-205-9215T>A | intron | N/A | NP_001320.1 | |||
| CTBP2 | NM_001083914.3 | c.-205-9215T>A | intron | N/A | NP_001077383.1 | ||||
| CTBP2 | NM_001290214.3 | c.-102+13204T>A | intron | N/A | NP_001277143.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTBP2 | ENST00000337195.11 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.-205-9215T>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000338615.5 | |||
| CTBP2 | ENST00000411419.7 | TSL:1 | c.-205-9215T>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000410474.2 | |||
| CTBP2 | ENST00000494626.6 | TSL:1 | c.-102+13204T>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000436285.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74340 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at