NM_001369.3:c.997C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.997C>G(p.Arg333Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,510 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R333Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001369.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001369.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.997C>G | p.Arg333Gly | missense | Exon 8 of 79 | ENSP00000265104.4 | Q8TE73 | ||
| DNAH5 | c.952C>G | p.Arg318Gly | missense | Exon 8 of 79 | ENSP00000505288.1 | A0A7P0Z455 | |||
| DNAH5 | TSL:2 | n.1405C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 8 of 12 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251170 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461510Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727056 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at