NM_001378454.1:c.1174C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):​c.1174C>T​(p.Arg392Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.257 in 1,606,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 66,086 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R392S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.39 ( 15844 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.24 ( 50242 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0890

Publications

40 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
ALMS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Alstrom syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=8.4957634E-7).
BP6
Variant 2-73424839-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73424839-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 383753.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.76 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkc.1174C>T p.Arg392Cys missense_variant Exon 5 of 23 ENST00000613296.6 NP_001365383.1
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkc.1174C>T p.Arg392Cys missense_variant Exon 5 of 23 NP_055935.4 Q8TCU4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkc.1174C>T p.Arg392Cys missense_variant Exon 5 of 23 1 NM_001378454.1 ENSP00000482968.1 Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.385
AC:
58555
AN:
151916
Hom.:
15781
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.767
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.268
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.372
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.175
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00713
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.150
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.243
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.210
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.239
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.338
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.266
AC:
65285
AN:
245640
AF XY:
0.248
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.784
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.407
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.173
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00614
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.232
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.236
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.242
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.243
AC:
353524
AN:
1454702
Hom.:
50242
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.239
AC XY:
172639
AN XY:
722594
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.780
AC:
25946
AN:
33250
American (AMR)
AF:
0.407
AC:
18020
AN:
44254
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.171
AC:
4425
AN:
25910
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0123
AC:
486
AN:
39570
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.167
AC:
14282
AN:
85472
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.231
AC:
12295
AN:
53182
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.244
AC:
1397
AN:
5722
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.236
AC:
261768
AN:
1107282
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.248
AC:
14905
AN:
60060
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12490
24981
37471
49962
62452
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
9018
18036
27054
36072
45090
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.386
AC:
58681
AN:
152034
Hom.:
15844
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.379
AC XY:
28175
AN XY:
74308
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.767
AC:
31822
AN:
41476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.373
AC:
5693
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.175
AC:
606
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00715
AC:
37
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.150
AC:
721
AN:
4804
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.243
AC:
2561
AN:
10550
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.219
AC:
64
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.239
AC:
16226
AN:
67964
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.334
AC:
707
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1384
2769
4153
5538
6922
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
476
952
1428
1904
2380
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.275
Hom.:
34555
Bravo
AF:
0.414
TwinsUK
AF:
0.229
AC:
848
ALSPAC
AF:
0.233
AC:
897
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.737
AC:
2778
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.237
AC:
1953
ExAC
AF:
0.268
AC:
32310
Asia WGS
AF:
0.123
AC:
430
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 09, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Arg392Cys in exon 5 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 87.82% (1161/1322) of African chrom osomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3; dbSNP rs3813227). -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Alstrom syndrome Benign:3
Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 21, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.061
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.63
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
3.2
DANN
Benign
0.36
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0060
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0019
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.32
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
8.5e-7
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.55
.;N;.
PhyloP100
0.089
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.57
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;.
Vest4
0.064
ClinPred
0.00046
T
GERP RS
0.18
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.055
gMVP
0.021
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3813227; hg19: chr2-73651967; COSMIC: COSV107272367; API