NM_001429.4:c.6390G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001429.4(EP300):c.6390G>A(p.Met2130Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000167 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M2130T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001429.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001429.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP300 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.6390G>A | p.Met2130Ile | missense | Exon 31 of 31 | ENSP00000263253.7 | Q09472 | ||
| EP300 | c.6420G>A | p.Met2140Ile | missense | Exon 31 of 31 | ENSP00000586141.1 | ||||
| EP300 | c.6390G>A | p.Met2130Ile | missense | Exon 31 of 31 | ENSP00000520505.1 | Q09472 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000940 AC: 143AN: 152138Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000219 AC: 55AN: 251298 AF XY: 0.000133 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000862 AC: 126AN: 1461850Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000811 AC XY: 59AN XY: 727218 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000939 AC: 143AN: 152256Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000833 AC XY: 62AN XY: 74436 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at