NM_003242.6:c.1525-8C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_003242.6(TGFBR2):c.1525-8C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000411 in 1,613,836 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

TGFBR2
NM_003242.6 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0001746

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.03

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TGFBR2 (HGNC:11773): (transforming growth factor beta receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a transmembrane protein that has a protein kinase domain, forms a heterodimeric complex with TGF-beta receptor type-1, and binds TGF-beta. This receptor/ligand complex phosphorylates proteins, which then enter the nucleus and regulate the transcription of genes related to cell proliferation, cell cycle arrest, wound healing, immunosuppression, and tumorigenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Marfan Syndrome, Loeys-Deitz Aortic Aneurysm Syndrome, and the development of various types of tumors. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

TGFBR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
Loeys-Dietz syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TGFBR2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).

BP6

Variant 3-30691412-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-30691412-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 213910.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00214 (326/152254) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00739 (307/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00671. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 166 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 326 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TGFBR2	NM_003242.6 link	c.1525-8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 6 of 6	ENST00000295754.10	NP_003233.4	P37173-1A3QNQ0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TGFBR2	ENST00000295754.10 link	c.1525-8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 6 of 6	1	NM_003242.6	ENSP00000295754.5		P37173-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00209

AC:

318

AN:

152136

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00722

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000560

AC:

140

AN:

250180

AF XY:

0.000429

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00759

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000405

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000231

AC:

337

AN:

1461582

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000190

AC XY:

138

AN XY:

727096

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00789

AC:

264

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000358

AC:

AN:

44712

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39690

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000104

AC:

AN:

86238

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53376

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000174

AC:

AN:

5762

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000630

AC:

AN:

1111832

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000663

AC:

AN:

60370

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.468

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00214

AC:

326

AN:

152254

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00223

AC XY:

166

AN XY:

74446

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00739

AC:

307

AN:

41548

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000915

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5170

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00189

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00256

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000578

AC:

AN:

3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:3

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 16, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Jul 26, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 22, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Nov 09, 2019

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TGFBR2: BP4, BS1 -

Marfan syndrome

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Loeys-Dietz syndrome

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.70

CADD

Benign

9.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.65

PhyloP100

1.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00017

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.016

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over