NM_004329.3:c.713G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.713G>A(p.Arg238Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,613,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R238W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000019 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.74

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

BMPR1A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
juvenile polyposis syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
congenital heart defects, multiple types
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
pulmonary arterial hypertension
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

BMPR1A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.20301971).

BP6

Variant 10-86917171-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86917171-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 141277.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000192 (28/1461808) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.000428 (17/39694). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000273. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 21 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 28 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BMPR1A	NM_004329.3 link	c.713G>A	p.Arg238Gln	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 13	ENST00000372037.8	NP_004320.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BMPR1A	ENST00000372037.8 link	c.713G>A	p.Arg238Gln	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 13	1	NM_004329.3	ENSP00000361107.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152052

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000578

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000955

AC:

AN:

251408

AF XY:

0.000125

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00114

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000264

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000192

AC:

AN:

1461808

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000289

AC XY:

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000428

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53412

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000809

AC:

AN:

1111974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60382

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.486

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74396

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41522

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000579

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4814

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10588

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67994

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000378

ExAC

AF:

0.0000494

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Juvenile polyposis syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 23, 2025

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.

Apr 05, 2018

Counsyl

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Jan 11, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

Apr 23, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Aug 11, 2020

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 19, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided

Uncertain:1

Jun 24, 2024

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, or neuroblastoma (PMID: 26580448, 30093976, 30630526); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25186949, 30093976, 26580448, 30630526)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.020

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.15

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.33

Eigen

Benign

0.077

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.29

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.97

M_CAP

Benign

0.036

MetaRNN

Benign

0.20

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.068

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.56

PhyloP100

6.7

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.77

PROVEAN

Benign

0.31

REVEL

Uncertain

0.42

Sift

Benign

0.097

Sift4G

Benign

0.17

Vest4

0.75

ClinPred

0.13

GERP RS

5.6

Varity_R

0.22

gMVP

0.58

Mutation Taster

=45/55

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over